Season 1, Episode 8

Enterprise AI Adoption: Operating System for Real Results

with Siddharth Bohra31 min

Siddharth Bohra: Founder of Trmeric.

Summary

Siddharth Bohra and Utsav Bhatt discuss the gap between AI strategy and execution, where many organisations struggle to turn ideas into business impact. Siddharth introduces the idea of an AI-native operating system for enterprise transformation, one that embeds AI into workflows and decisions, and explores the shift toward strategy as a product.

Key insights

  1. The strategy-to-execution gap is where most AI value is lost.
  2. An AI-native operating system can anchor enterprise transformation.
  3. Embed AI in workflows and decisions instead of layering it on top.
  4. Strategy as a product is changing consulting models.
  5. Organisational readiness and ownership are the real blockers.

Full transcript

Automatically generated from the episode audio and lightly edited. About 4,800 words.

Utsav Bhatt

So we are entering an era where strategic insight is no longer just crafted by people, it is being generated by systems. Welcome to Alt consulting conversations. This is where we explore how strategy, innovation and advisory models are being reshaped by AI. Now in each of this episode, as you have heard previously, we unpack how leaders who are building buying these new systems are thinking about key aspects like trust, adoption and the future of strategic making.

My guest today is Siddharth Bohra, the founder of Trmeric, AI platform purpose-built for technology teams and CIO organizations. ⁓ Trmeric, Siddharth led LTI Mindtree's digital business globally with full P&L responsibility across a variety of areas like cloud infrastructure, security, ⁓ data interactive, and CRM. ⁓ He has incubated multiple new businesses, data products, public cloud platforms, and built high growth practices across sectors. ⁓ LTI, he was nearly for a decade at Infosys, ⁓ leading their high-tech business unit. ⁓ Earlier in his career, he was also an entrepreneur in e-commerce domain and as a sales leader in PepsiCo, so a diverse range of experience. And alumnus IIM Calcutta and a member of MIT CISR's Analytics Advisory Board. Siddharth is based out of Silicon Valley. So Siddharth, thank you so much for spending time with me today.

Siddharth Bohra

Hey, Utsav, thanks for having me. Very excited to be part of this conversation.

Utsav Bhatt

So from your vantage point, how is strategy consulting changing with the rise of AI? What parts of consulting engagement do you see is now getting automated or fundamentally reshaped?

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, I I think that's a great question. And I'm sure there are lots of views on this topic. And each one of them correct from the vantage point of the person who has the view. ⁓ I've seen two worlds, the world that you just described I came from, which are the world of consulting, working with some of the largest enterprises in the world on some of their most mission critical initiatives. And the other vantage point, which is of trmeric where we again are partnering with some of the largest enterprises in the world, but we're building a product which is AI native or intelligence native, so to say.

And the way I would look at how strategy consulting or consulting for that matter would evolve is I would say the bar for what represents good consulting output is definitely going to go up. ⁓ Because intelligent systems will begin to organize a lot of the learnings and the experiences of every organization into some sort of a knowledge fabric, which means that organizations which traditionally lost knowledge to attrition or to tribal ways of working ⁓ will see a systemic approach or a systemic intervention where that knowledge will not exactly be lost. So ⁓ I think the role of consulting, strategy consulting, will need to evolve. It will still be pretty pertinent, I would say. But ⁓ I would say the days of consulting which is not genuinely value adding are kind of on their taper down.

So I would say it will raise the bar a lot for the consulting stream in general. And the guys who get on the right side of it, the guys who truly reimagine consulting and output of consulting with AI will do get disproportionate benefit from it.

Utsav Bhatt

Right. you're sort of leading that ⁓ entire trend with ⁓ a very ⁓ different way of thinking about how CIOs could operate. So maybe a quick brief on what trmeric is for people who yet don't know about it.

Siddharth Bohra

Sure, absolutely. So, know, Trmeric essentially, we call ourselves as an enterprise transformation OS. And if I have to unpack what that means, if you look at most enterprises, and especially the technology functions in the enterprise, they have two primary roles. One is to keep the business running, keep the systems running, keep your applications, infrastructure, all of that.

And the second part is to help that enterprise transform consistently, know, continuously. Earlier it was cloud, then it was data, before that was ERP, now it's Gen AI. Every enterprise needs to stay, for them to stay competitively, strong, needs to, is embracing technology to kind of stay ahead. We are that for all things change, right?

So we bring the flow of work of change. the resources associated to change, and the outcomes that change produces all in one platform. The other way to look at it is we kind of collapse this gap between business strategy and tech execution. And you've been in the strategy world long enough, Utsav to know that the best of strategy eventually gets into some sort of a PPT. That PPT then gets into some documents to get fleshed out into digital initiatives.

And then it gets somewhere into some execution mode. So the distance between what was thought to be done and what is actually getting done is very wide. It's very fragmented. And we're using AI to kind of collapse that gap so that they live on the same plane.

Utsav Bhatt

Right, and that's like, know, it's a very specific problem, a problem which has been known for years and there's so many projects which are again, re-sanctioned to figure out how do I convert this PPT deck into something real and do the execution. So when you sort of have this value proposition for C-suite leaders and you talk to them, ⁓ even after sort of understanding what kind of problem you solve and how AI plugs that, what do they hesitate about in terms of initially, you know, thinking about taking such a tool in their system? What are their fears? What are the, what is the excitement that you hear from them?

Siddharth Bohra

That's an awesome question. Well, I feel that there are a host of considerations that enterprises have when they buy any software, and specifically in our case. I'd say the first one is the ability to embrace change. Not every enterprise is at a point in time where they want to go through a a change like this.

This is a fairly significant change in kind of ways of working. So enterprises are always sizing up in terms of are we ready? ⁓ We believe they're ready. Every enterprise is ready, but they have to be in the right frame of mind, the right point in time to feel like that. And I'm talking about the concerns that they typically have.

I would say the second concern that is often ⁓ cited is Who within my organization is going to own this ⁓ ⁓ if they don't find the right owner who was going to be able to dedicate the right time and effort, then they will kind of push it out to a point. This, again, because it's change, you don't want to just for it to ⁓ lost in translation. I would say those are the two. I mean, I can go on, but I would say those are the two reasons.

There is always an inherent concern about AI and what it will do to But when people see our product and the way we built it out, it amplifies human potential. So I think that fear goes away rather very quickly. So I would say those are the top two issues which remain concerns in terms of ⁓ getting started on trmeric. What excites them on the other side ⁓ the, and I think you, you we ⁓ started conversation, you were talking about this embedding AI into workflows.

Which means it's his native AI, not just superimposed AI. So they like the fact how we've reimagined ⁓ their day in life, the processes they execute day in, day out. For example, if you're planning a strategic initiative, typically that initiative planning took many conversations, took forums, took PPTs, spreadsheets, what have you. And what we've been able to do is to reimagine that whole mishmash of experience into a very conversational, agentic, knowledge-rich, memory-rich conversation that many people can come together on.

And AI acts like one of the participants to the process and say, hey, listen, if you're looking to do this, here are some considerations you want to keep in mind. Here's what success would look like. Here are some past challenges you faced in similar programs. Here's the time and effort that it's likely to take.

Now they like the fact that somebody is bringing rich insights to this and facilitating the process and not trying to eliminate the guy who's trying to conceive the whole initiative. So I think they get very excited by the very practical embedding of AI in the right places for the right insights, the right actions. I think people are really troubled by wasted time. There's just zero to one reinvention happens at every level.

Is just a massive waste of time. And I think AI cuts that out in a very, very material way. I would say that excites them. ⁓ And the fact that today, one of our customers said that, and she's a chief transformation officer, she said, everybody in my team finds a higher sense of purpose because now they can see which business strategy are they moving the needle on. So I think finding that purpose and not being lost in a technology project is a pretty cool thing.

So I would say those are the three things that excite

Utsav Bhatt

Hmm. Interesting, interesting. So in the book, I have mentioned an archetype for strategy consulting. One of them is strategy as a product.

So lot of companies trying to solve this problem by creating a product with AI within it. Some of them might have a layer of ⁓ service on top of it and some are pure play companies. So if you sort of ⁓ think all the conversations you have had in the last couple of years with ⁓ executives who have evaluated trmeric, have had conversations on this and finally made decision to either go with trmeric or take a decision to say pause and okay we'll come back after a couple of quarters. They are essentially making a trade-off in terms of what they have right now versus the promise that they have been told ⁓ the tool will offer.

So you about purely trade-offs, what are the elements on which they are making a decision ⁓ and say okay are great points and hence I am going with trmeric. Is it like the elements like speed, cost, depth, rigor, ⁓ trust, higher level of purpose that my team might get. So practically when they take that decision and after three months when you have the conversation with them, what was that couple of things which made them switch?

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, I feel that different stakeholders respond to different vectors of value, if I may say so. And maybe I'll share the top two or three. And maybe there is an overlap with the previous point as well. ⁓ But first one would be. This whole combination of being practically be able to use AI and not use AI because everybody's going to say use AI, but so practically use AI and be able to do their day job better.

And I just gave that planning example, I can give more, but it is real. It's not like I'm just trying to write a better email. I am prioritizing the right project and deprioritizing a project that doesn't have ROI is a very material implication transaction that you can do with AI and that would do with trmeric. So this combination of, I am AI aware and AI user and using it in a very material way truly appeals to ⁓ The second theme that comes up is, I had said that there's a lot of waste of time.

Incredible amount of waste of time, that intelligent system can eliminate reports, ⁓ hoc requests, ⁓ for information. That's like 30 to 50 % of a day of a manager, right? And you can say you just don't need to do all this and you can stay on top of it. So this ⁓ prospect doing more with their time and doing things that they really think will add more value is very appealing.

To our users. ⁓ And I'd say third is this, it makes my team, my organization look good. Get ahead, get ahead, and stay more competitive. Because again, transformation is a space which is like this, strategy to execution thing, where I can go in front of lot of our customers, our technology people. Now they are far more business aware because that's how we build the product.

So I can have an equal conversation with my functional business partners and say, hey, this is what you should be doing. This is what you may not be doing. Makes you and your team look good. So I think those are some massively attractive points. ⁓ That's what I would say is it eventually gets personal as well in a lot of these conversations.

Utsav Bhatt

Right it's also a very interesting way to keep the organizational ⁓ not in a knowledge management system which might be outdated, but something which lives as a memory and everyone can start using when it So as in when you start analyzing a lot of and ⁓ this AI-based insights for clients, ⁓ in this where do you see the role of human advisors ⁓ that irreplaceable value because there's still a role for them to play ⁓ this, ⁓ you think ⁓ should not touch at this point of time because it is ⁓ which is truly different.

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, feel that ⁓ I genuinely feel that, and I can speak more for Trmeric, I'm not generalizing AI, ⁓ because people have different versions of what AI should do. People talk about of jobs. ⁓ We're not into that gig. ⁓ I feel the role humans is ⁓ two or three folds. Firstly, I think to truly understand how AI can augment and amplify their role. Many a times, that understanding remains very superficial.

And it's like any other change, right? If you just don't understand a technology theme, something new, and you kind of operate on the surface, you may not get the best value from it. So I feel the one big thing is to genuinely understand that, hey, here's what's in front of me, but what can I really do with it? Because that power of a knowledge fabric, the power of telemetry of connected views of the world, the power of what agents can do is immense.

And it's only as good as what humans put it to use for in many ways. So I think that's one big thing. And the role of humans, that was your question. I think the other piece that becomes very important is now the connected tissue of the organization is just not a Slack channel.

Right? A system is learning from the behavior of everybody using the system. So I think the humans can, what they can do is kind of amplify the experiences they are having with an intelligent system so that everybody else can have a similar good experience or everybody else can prevent a not so good experience. So I think getting together and saying here, here's what. ⁓ So I would say that's the second piece. in third piece is really I feel human discretion, human experience, human decision making is still quite amazing, right?

And yes, AI can dish out a whole bunch of options for you, but you can constantly be raising the bar. How do we look at a product? A product is getting constantly more and more intelligent. The reason it's getting more and more intelligent is because we're pushing our brains and saying, OK, what more can we do?

What more can we do? And similarly, the users of AI technologies can really do a lot more with their work, a lot more with what the organizations are expecting them to do. So it's to constantly reimagine what more can they do with their job. So I would say that's the trifecta of know what AI can do well. ⁓ Spread that knowledge, spread that experience because as an organization then everybody's benefiting from it.

And thirdly is spend the mind to think if a lot of my work is getting automated, what do I do with my time? What more can I do? And then that's a very cool thing to think about.

Utsav Bhatt

That's an interesting way to put it. So be aware what it can do, spread the knowledge so that others can take advantage of it and then with the balance time that you have, I think work on those higher order aspects which you've never got time to think about because you're just busy running the wheels of the company.

Siddharth Bohra

That is exactly right.

Utsav Bhatt

So, you ⁓ you've been like two years in this journey to two and a half years building ⁓ and you're working closely with clients, onboarding new clients every So when you are sort of advising anyone who is now creating an AI native product, know, grounds up, what learnings would you want to share?

Siddharth Bohra

Wow, that's a tough question.

Utsav Bhatt

Because two years back, we were having a very different model of chat GPT. Now we are in a different era. So even your product building, although it's AI, is continuously sort of getting updated. And I sort of know from my experience, there are a couple of colleagues I know in strategy consulting who created these layers on top of chat GPT, which would say, okay, write a prompt and we will give you a more curated way in which the output can be generated.

Now that's not required because chat GPT itself doing it. In a way, they're sort of learning. from interactions and just eating in a sort of creating layer by layer, eating others market share. So from that experience, ⁓ what are the learnings?

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, maybe two, that's a great question again. As always, you ask very good questions. ⁓ I'd say the first thing is. You're not solving an AI problem. You're solving a customer problem with AI.

Many times you can get very confused about it. A lot of this narrative is about ROI from AI. It's not ROI from AI, it's ROI from the use case that you used AI for. And there two different things.

When people, and I think your example was pretty cool, zoom in on real problems to solve for. And you will realize that AI is only one component of solving that problem. And so I think that's one part that look at the problem, look at it holistically, and make sure you're not over-indexing on AI just because you want to be an AI company. ⁓ Chances are that that journey is going to be short ⁓ because it's not appealing to the customer. The customer really wants to solve the problem.

I would say that's one part. ⁓ I think the second part is, at least I can speak for myself, is just be ready for all sorts of surprises, ready for unexpected responses, be ready for unexpected failures and unexpected successes. And when your expectation is very hard cast, then the disappointment is much higher. And you don't want to be. And so it's a more entrepreneurial journey kind of a thing that Stay very nimble, very agile, very flexible in your expectations because chances are there will be surprises out there.

So I'd say just because you're doing an AI product, there's no guarantee for success at all. And I'd say the third piece that we've learned is, besides the obvious ones of team and other thing, is not, is the fact that and maybe it's connected to the first point is that AI can be one component, but your moat so to say, your differentiation that you bring to the table, you got to look at, you have to apply systems thinking to it. You have to think about it holistically because that magic of connecting three or four layers of competitive advantage, for example, our product builds, autonomously builds a knowledge fabric. But knowledge fabric without the right workflows is not fun.

If I don't embed the insight at the right point, what do I do with that fabric which is sitting somewhere else, right? I'm in planning mode and I'm not getting anything from it. So we combine that with workflows. Now workflows are great, but I have a lot of work.

So how do I do so many times the, yeah, it's a great workflow, but can I automate some of this stuff? So do you bring in agents? Okay, the agent will go do some of that stuff. layer these things in so that you can, so my point simply is that think holistically about your problem and apply that systems thinking approach and then build that whole total solution. This is the era of building total solutions and not piecemeal ones.

So I'd say those three.

Utsav Bhatt

yeah. Right. One thing which I always wanted to ask you is, now maybe it's the right time. You have spent like decades in ⁓ traditional IT consulting organizations on how work was delivered, sold, and then you have a very different experience now.

So if I think from a perspective of a consultant who is aspiring to again, go in this field of IT and do something interesting, build a great future. From your experience, what people who work in trmeric have sort of learned or experienced very differently as compared to if they were in traditional IT organization. ⁓ would be running the motions, they'd be project managers, doing projects in typical way, but now here, there's new way of thinking. And as you said, there are a lot of surprises that you sort of see and you're learning constantly. ⁓ So there is any anecdote, any example ⁓ of a who has worked at Trmeric and he's like, my God, like I never thought I would ⁓ be time in doing this stuff. ⁓ I will ever get an opportunity to work in this niche domain trying to build skills for future. So any reflections on that?

Specifically from a perspective of a fresh engineer coming out of college, now studied computer science and feeling, my god, the entire industry is going to be shaken. There's a new way of working. What should I do?

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, I'd say that... My first suggestion is don't be really look around for opportunities. Try very hard to look for opportunities. This narrative of an industry which is slowing down and an industry which is like you're not going to need engineers and all that.

I am not a big subscriber of that. ⁓ Yes, engineers will produce more work than they used to. But there will be more work being produced in general, because now a lot more innovation is possible. So don't subscribe. First, my suggestion is don't subscribe to this downbeat theme.

Traditional avenues might be shrinking the typical IT services companies, and not hiring as many and all of that. But there's so many more companies coming up. I'd say the second part is, and a lot of our engineering team, which is not very large, by the way, you don't need too many. people these days, most of them are very young. Some of them are right after college.

And they have demonstrated incredible hunger to learn. And by the way, this field is only three years old, isn't it? Nobody can say I'm 15 years experienced in this. So a newbie's experience is only three years less than the most experienced guy in the world, so to say.

So you're not that far behind from a very experienced guy. So I'd say that it's a great moment to be an engineer. Give it your best shot. Learn.

Push the boundaries of what you think you're capable of doing. And you will do so much more than what you ever thought you'd do in the first year of your job. Right? So engineering is very powerful function.

So I'd say that is the second piece. And the third is look for an environment which is empowering, which is ⁓ not finger pointing. It's not easy to find it and who knows what's the best method, but conversations give it away ⁓ So you also need an environment where you're allowed to try things out, where you're given the responsibility and not told you're one rookie and this is all you're going to do. So I would say, firstly, feel positive about the time you're in.

Secondly, and work very hard to get the right scout for the opportunities. Secondly, when you get one, give it 155 % because there's just so much you will be able to do. And the third thing is, and maybe that should have been the second thing, look for an environment that enables and empowers. ⁓ Because we've seen stunning success with our team. Couldn't have myself imagined this.

You know I was at a large VC today and they saw what we've done and said, really? With this engineering team and that size? And I said, yeah. I would say phenomenal time.

Utsav Bhatt

Yeah, no, absolutely. Finally, the last point, you got a chance to go through Alt consulting book. ⁓ What ideas, if any, resonated for you?

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, I mean, think that you have taken almost a first step of saying that consulting as we know it is, well, I won't use dire words, but legacy, is to me the biggest theme there. And then what you've done with the book is you kind of unpeeled that onion and explored every aspect of what traditional consulting was and what it's going to become. So you kind of almost put a framework around the future of, I would say, strategic advisory. I won't use the word strategic advisory because I think consulting has this slightly interesting notion of people come and go.

Consultant will come, give some gyan, and like, you know. They're off to the next engagement. A strategic advisor, I say this because you're not going to have in the future, you're not going to give the same advice to the same guy three times over. That happened in the past.

With intelligent systems, and I would say folks such as yourselves have to build those systems so that the customer feels I'm compounding the value from the same strategic advisor. And I'm not asking them for the same, old shit, now six months ago I had the same thing, two years ago I had the same thing, that can't happen. So I feel that what you've done is you broached a very critical topic that is everybody's mind. You put a framework to it ⁓ say this is how the future looks like. ⁓ ⁓ have anecdotes, you have examples to kind of, you've sprung it all in.

So I just feel that ⁓ like a charter for the future. ⁓ That's what I really like about what you've done. And you've, in many ways, shared your personal experiences, not theoretical. So it comes from a position of real life experiences, which makes it all that more powerful.

Utsav Bhatt

Thank you so much Siddharth, this was a lovely conversation and I think the gap you are solving of bridging that strategy on a PowerPoint deck to reality and powering that with AI is interesting. There lot of interesting takeaways from this conversation. The one that you said at the end, was, are just three years old in this era and there's no one who has 15 years of experience in AI. I think it's very comforting to hear for anyone getting into this area.

And it is a possibility for you to go and challenge the status quo, figure out new ways of working. I hope Trmeric builds on that further has ⁓ very interesting conversations interesting ⁓ way of supporting CIO. So thank you so much for sharing your perspective. I look forward to having such conversations in the future.

Siddharth Bohra

Yeah, thanks for having me and all the best wishes for continuing to do the amazing stuff you're doing Utsav So all the very best. Thank you. Bye-bye.